Good Morning!

They started with a mission to make AI safe for humanity—and ended up becoming one of the most powerful, paradoxical companies on Earth.

OpenAI was born from a utopian ideal: no shareholders, no profit motives, just research for the public good. But utopias don’t scale. Somewhere between billion-dollar investments and boardroom coups, OpenAI became something stranger—a nonprofit-controlled, for-profit company racing to commercialize the very technology it once sought to contain. It’s now a symbol of the contradictions driving the AI boom: open in name, closed in practice; cautious in tone, aggressive in action.

Which brings us to this week’s headlines: a market rally fueled by a U.S.–China tariff truce, a second bankruptcy for Rite Aid, and Trump’s latest swing at prescription drug prices. Add in a luxury jet controversy and mounting pressure to break up Alphabet, and you start to see the pattern. The institutions shaping our world—tech, government, media—are all navigating the same fault lines between idealism and influence, safety and speed, transparency and control.

-Skool Projekt Staff

The Logic (and Chaos) of OpenAI
by Skool Projekt Staff

OpenAI: Promise and Power

In the early days of artificial intelligence, there was a kind of quiet optimism, almost naive in its simplicity. The premise was straightforward: if we’re going to build machines that can think, we should probably make sure they don’t end up destroying us. It wasn’t paranoia, it was caution. That’s where OpenAI came in. Founded in 2015 with a billion-dollar promise and a mission that felt more like a thought experiment than a startup pitch, OpenAI was born as a nonprofit dedicated to ensuring artificial general intelligence would benefit all of humanity. No shareholders. No private control. Just research in the public interest. A utopian idea wrapped in very real technology.

But utopias don’t always scale. And as OpenAI evolved, so did the complexity of its mission. What began as a noble crusade against AI monopolization gradually bent under the weight of market forces, investor pressure, and the staggering cost of frontier research. By 2019, the organization that once vowed never to commercialize its work had created a for-profit subsidiary and taken a billion-dollar investment from Microsoft. The nonprofit became a nonprofit-controlled for-profit with “capped returns.” To outsiders, it looked like a hedge. To insiders, a compromise. But it raised a fundamental question: Was OpenAI still trying to save the world, or had it quietly joined the race to run it?

That tension is what defines OpenAI. It builds tools that simulate flawless logic while being caught in the same dramas that haunt every human institution: boardroom politics, internal power plays, philosophical fractures. It warns the world of AI’s risks while racing to lead the industry. And it’s that contradiction that makes the company so fascinating. Because the closer you look, the more it stops being just an AI lab and starts to look like a moral and strategic experiment unfolding in real time.

In November 2023, the contradictions burst into public view. OpenAI’s nonprofit board abruptly fired CEO Sam Altman, citing vague concerns over transparency. Within hours, nearly the entire staff threatened to quit. Microsoft offered to hire them all. By the end of the week, Altman was reinstated, the board was reshuffled, and operations resumed; publicly intact, but philosophically shaken. A company designed to rise above Silicon Valley’s corporate churn had just staged one of its most dramatic corporate soap operas.

Then, in early 2024, Elon Musk sued. The lawsuit accused OpenAI and Altman of betraying the nonprofit’s founding mission by transforming the organization into what Musk called a “closed-source de facto subsidiary” of Microsoft. Musk, one of OpenAI’s original funders, argued that the lab had abandoned its ethical roots in pursuit of power and profit. OpenAI responded with internal emails showing that Musk himself had once tried to take control of the company, and only walked away when that plan was rejected. The irony wasn’t subtle. A company created to avoid centralized AI control was now in legal battle with one of its creators… for centralizing control.

This all unfolded against OpenAI’s proposed shift to a public benefit corporation—a structure meant to codify its mission while allowing for capital, scale, and long-term governance. It’s an attempt to formalize what OpenAI has long been improvising: a hybrid model that tries to balance public good with private investment. Whether it brings clarity or just more contradiction is still an open question. But it suggests something important. OpenAI isn’t trying to hide the tension. It’s trying, in its own way, to make room for it.

Maybe that’s what we should expect. Artificial intelligence isn’t being developed in a vacuum. It’s being shaped by people; ambitious, flawed, idealistic people. The smarter our machines get, the more they reveal our contradictions. We say we want safety, but we also want speed. We ask for transparency, but guard secrets. We say it’s for humanity, but never agree on what that means. OpenAI isn’t a company that’s lost its mission. It’s one that’s realizing how impossible that mission was to begin with.

That might be its greatest strength. Unlike companies that pretend to have the answers, OpenAI has become a case study in ambiguity. Its internal chaos doesn’t mean failure. It might just mean honesty. Because building something this new, this consequential, requires making decisions in the dark. There are no neat solutions, only tradeoffs. And the friction, uncomfortable as it is, might be the clearest sign that the stakes are real.

So yes, OpenAI is messy. It’s inconsistent. It preaches caution while pushing forward. But that doesn’t make it a contradiction. It makes it human. And maybe that’s why it matters. Because as long as humans are building intelligence, the future of AI will always carry a trace of our own logic… and all of our chaos.

A message from Projekts Workshop

At Projekts Workshop, we help brands find their voice, sharpen their story, and show up with purpose.

We design and run newsletter strategies that align your message, voice, and content—delivering consistent, audience-focused stories across email and social. And we build brand strategies that connect positioning, messaging, and visual identity into one cohesive, lasting story.

Whether you’re building, rebuilding, or growing, we’re here to help you do it with clarity, confidence, and consistency.